Lee & Garasia, LLC
Se Habla Espanol
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

Five Year “Garcia” Rule and Applying for Citizenship in New Jersey

| Jul 13, 2016 | Citizenship and Naturalization, Immigration Court Cases, Opinion

Following up on the heels of our last post, the Third Circuit of Appeals issued two precedential decisions affirming a denial of US citizenship to two different parties who had acquired their permanent residency through false statements or fraud. The two cases were decided by two different panels but interestingly, arrived at the same conclusion. The two cases are Saliba v. Attorney General and Koszelnik v. Secretary of Homeland Security. Although the facts are different, the gist of both cases is that the immigrants in question secured their green cards by affirmatively providing false information on their permanent resident applications. One party represented that he was a citizen of Lebanon when he wasn’t, and the other omitted the fact that he had an A number and had actually been in court proceedings when applying for their green cards. Both gentlemen’s lies were not caught at the green card stage and they subsequently applied for naturalization more than five years later. In both cases, the Court denied their petitions, predicating their decisions largely on the notion that even though the applicants were permanent residents, they were nevertheless not “lawfully admitted” as permanent residents, as required by 8 U.S.C. 1429.

Given the ramifications, these binding decisions are very important to immigrants in New Jersey, as well as those states within the Third Circuit. There are numerous people who may have become permanent residents through fraud or mistake still yearning to become US citizens but hesitant to try. Worse, there are those who have already applied (who should not have) that have now jeopardized their status. These cases reinforce the critical distinction between being protected from revocation/rescission and qualifying for naturalization. Notwithstanding that the government may not seek to revoke a person’s green card after the statute of limitations has passed, permanent residents should disabuse themselves of the notion that they are entitled to or automatically qualify for naturalization-at least in the Third Circuit. The Court pretty much dismantled the sundry arguments propounded by counsel including:

  • The expiration of the statute of limitations transformed admission from unlawful to lawful
  • Equity
  • The government implicitly waived any grounds of inadmissibility

As the Court remarked, issues of removal, rescission, and naturalization are raise different legal questions.

A careful reading of the questions on the N-400 application should certainly give one pause, especially if one has procured his/her green card through fraud or misrepresentation. The way that some of the questions are phrased practically invite trouble if the circumstances behind one’s green card are suspect–which again, should prod prudent people to consult with attorneys to determine if citizenship is viable. Now that judicial redress seems closed, one can only hope for an administrative measure one day (and that day may be far off) that salvages people from the limbo they find themselves in.

The above is general information/opinion and should not be taken or relied upon as legal advice. It is neither intended to create an attorney-client relationship nor substitute for legal counsel.

Findlaw Network