COVID-19 UPDATE: USCIS HAS RESUMED APPOINTMENTS. CONSULTATIONS AVAILABLE BY PHONE OR VIDEO.
Lee & Garasia, LLC
  • Tel: 732-516-1717
  • Toll free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence for Over 20 Years
  • "Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client's needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly... recommend this firm to anyone." Read More

  • "I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate." Read More

  • "I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You've really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate." Read More

  • "Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time." Read More

  • "Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time." Read More

  • "I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!" Read More

  • "Stalin - Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs." Read More

  • "Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work.He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia." Read More

  • "Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)" Read More

Supreme Court Opens Door for Cancellation of Removal for Thousands of Immigrants

On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court issued an extremely important decision with potentially large-scale ramifications for thousands of people in removal proceedings. In Pereira v. Sessions, the Court held that the stop-rule governing continuous presence for cancellation of removal cases is not triggered by service of a notice to appear that does not specify the time and place at which removal proceedings are to be held.

Loosely known by its misnomer "the ten year law" in some immigrant communities, cancellation of removal for non-permanent residents is one of the most sought-after forms of relief in immigration court, with a grant conferring permanent residence. However, there are numerous eligibility requirements, including but not limited to ten years continuous physical presence in the US immediately preceding the date of application for cancellation. Under the stop-time rule, continuous presence will be deemed to stop upon a number of triggering events, one of them being the service of a Notice to Appear ("NTA") under 8 USC 1229(a). As discussed in a previous entry, a Notice to Appear is essentially a charging document prepared by the government that contains certain allegations and states the basis of a respondent's removability. As a practical example, an undocumented person who has been served with an NTA after nine years of being here would be precluded from cancellation of removal.

This has literally happened to thousands of people, despite the fact that vast majorities of putative Notice to Appears fail to specifically designate and time and place at which removal proceedings shall be held, as required by section 1229(a). Instead, the NTAs commonly state that the time, place, or date of the initial hearing is "to be determined." Using a common-sense, literal reading of the statute, the Supreme Court held that since such notices do not fairly apprise the noncitizen when and where the removal proceedings will be held, the charging documents are not Notices to Appear as referred to in the statute and therefore do not trigger the stop-time rule. This is a momentous ruling given that nearly all NTAs issued within the last few years do not specify the date, place, or time of the first master calendar hearing. Under the Supreme Court's holding, these deficient notices do not stop the clock for cancellation of removal physical presence. Individuals who were previously deemed ineligible for cancellation based on continuous presence may now potentially revisit the issue, as the clock may still be running.

This decision potentially benefits not only people currently in removal proceedings but also those who may have already been ordered removed. There may be viable grounds to reopen proceedings as well as reconsider previous rulings. Even more importantly, the decision has set the government on its heels and will likely arrest its rampant practice of arbitrarily putting people into the system without affording them basic, essential information. Although the decision arose out of the stop-time context, there is no language in the holding that explicitly limits it to stop-time applications. There may be a valid argument that according to the Pereira, such Notice to Appears (ones that fail to list a specific date, time, or place) are per se defective, and grounds for termination of proceedings. How such arguments will play out before overwhelmed immigration court judges remains to be seen in the next few weeks. Stay tuned. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION

    • Avvo Rating 10.0 | Superb
    • Client Distinction Award martindale.com | 2016 Martindale-Hubbell Client Distinction Award
    • New Jersey State Bar Association | Paris Lee Chair - Immigration Section 2015-2016
    • Nationally Recognized | Newsweek Nationwide Showcase | Top Attorneys 2013
    • New Jersey Chapter | American Immigration Lawyers Association | Angie Garasia | Chapter Chair 2015-2016
Email Us For A Response

Start Your Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Lee & Garasia, LLC
190 State Route 27
Edison, NJ 08820

Map & Directions

icon phone732-516-1717 icon phone888-404-5876