Lee & Garasia, LLC
Se Habla Espanol
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

Is the End of INFOPASS? USCIS To Discontinue Self-Scheduling

| Nov 5, 2018 | INFOPASS

Just last week, USCIS announced that it will be expanding its Information Services Modernization Program to several major district offices. During the first quarter of next year (2019), it is expected that Newark will be among the first batch, with eventually all remaining field offices implementing the protocol by the end of the year.

What exactly is the Information Services Modernization Program? Last year, we discussed the government toying with pilot programs eliminating INFOPASS self-scheduling. This new program is the realization of that initiative, dispensing with the public’s ability to schedule their own appointments to visit immigration offices. Under the new procedure, individuals are encouraged to check the status of their cases online rather than inquire directly with an immigration officer. If an in-person appointment is truly warranted, “personnel at the USCIS Contact Center will help schedule an appointment without the individual having to search for available timeslots.” In other words, it appears that a government official will schedule the appointment at his/her own discretion without regard to an individual’s availability or time preference.

While the program purports to increase efficiency, some have characterized this transition as another effort by the Administration to fortify its “invisible wall.” And not without reason. There are a lot of practical considerations that seemed to have been overlooked or dismissed by this decision. One major problem is that government personnel appear to have a wide degree of discretion in determining whether an appointment is warranted. There may be situations where an officer fails to appreciate over the phone, either through miscommunication or misunderstanding, the nature of a case and wrongly decides not to grant an appointment. Unless the individual retains the services of an attorney, there may be little recourse to get the situation addressed. Furthermore, it seems that if an appointment is scheduled, it is without any regard to the individual’s availability. What if an appointment is scheduled months away? Or what if an appointment is scheduled when an individual is not able to attend for valid reasons? From the looks of it, there doesn’t seem to be any prospect of the government extending any accommodation to the public.

Given the imminent changes, it is imperative that applicants scrupulously track their cases and apprise the government of any address changes. It is likely that a vast majority of individuals will be denied in-person appointments and constrained to consult a notoriously inaccurate case status system.

The above is general information only and not to be relied upon as legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship nor should it be relied upon in lieu of consultation with an attorney.

Findlaw Network