Lee & Garasia, LLC
Se Habla Espanol
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

The N-400 Citizenship Form May Undergo More Changes

| Feb 4, 2019 | Citizenship and Naturalization

In recent years, many of the most commonly filed immigration forms underwent substantial revisions. These include the I-130 Petition for Alien Relative; I-129F Petition for Fiance; I-485 Application to Adjust Status; and N-400, Application for Naturalization. Rather than simplifying what is often an arcane process, the forms arguably obfuscate and complicate things even more. Soon, it is very likely that the N-400 will be changing again. Unfortunately, some of the proposed revisions and requirements will make the process more onerous and confusing, especially to a layperson who might be attempting to file pro-se.

One of the more significant changes pertains to travel history. Currently, the N-400 application only requires the applicant to list trips outside the US, 24 hours or more, taken within the last five years. The proposed revisions require the applicant to list all trips taken since becoming a permanent resident or during the last ten years. Practically speaking, it is labor intensive enough for individuals to accurately document trips within the last five years. Sometimes, entry and exit stamps are not recorded in the passport, and other times, a person’s travel history may not be available or accessibly though Customs and Border Protection. Nevertheless, since continuous residence is an eligibility requirement, requesting a person’s five-year travel history is not unreasonable. What is unreasonable, however, is expecting an applicant to document an additional five years of trips which have nothing to do with the five-year statutory period and are therefore practically irrelevant to the applicant’s eligibility.

Another disturbing change relates to documentary requirements. The new changes call for applicants to submit copies of their tax returns at the time of filing. Additionally, birth certificates of children will be expected to submitted with the application. While tax returns may be asked at the time of the interview, they are currently not required to be filed with the application. Making them required initial evidence seems unnecessary. Even more unnecessary, though, are the birth certificates of children, which arguably have nothing to do with whether someone qualifies for citizenship, especially since all the information is already disclosed on the appropriate section of the form.

Beyond the two aforementioned proposals, there are a number of superfluous questions. Their redundancy and vagueness not only increase the length but also the amount of time necessary to complete the application. In short, the N-400 process is formidable enough with the current application, increased processing times, and heightened scrutiny. These revisions are nether necessary nor appropriate at this time.

The above information is general information only and not to be relied upon as legal advice. It does not create an attorney client relationship, nor should it be relied upon in lieu of consultation with an attorney.

Findlaw Network