Lee & Garasia, LLC
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

Can ICE Arrest or Pick Someone Up Years After Conviction?

| Apr 15, 2019 | Deportation, Immigration Consequences of Crimes

All too often these days, unfortunately, foreign nationals are picked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and detained for crimes for which they were convicted of years ago. Under Section 236c of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the government is allowed to hold individuals without affording them an opportunity for bond or release. Otherwise known as mandatory detention, 236c applies to the following classes of individuals:

· Individuals who are inadmissible for having committed an offense described in INA 212(a)(2)

· Individuals who are deportable for having committed an offense described in INA 237(a)(2)(A)(ii), 237(a)(2)(iii); 237(a)(2)(B), 237(a)(2)(C), or 237(a)(2)(D)

· Individuals who are deportable under INA 237(a)(2)(A)(i)

· Individuals who are inadmissible under INA 212(a)(3)(B) or deportable under INA 237(a)(4)(B)

Drug offenses and crimes involving moral turpitude, in some shape or form, depending on whether the person is inadmissible or deportable, will trigger mandatory detention concerns.

Naturally, the question arises whether such detention is warranted or justified when the individual is not apprehended by ICE “when released”-which one would reasonably construe to mean immediately-but much later, sometimes years. Well, the Supreme Court addressed this question very recently in Nielsen vs. Preap. The decision is not the easiest to read, but the gist is that an individual does not have to be arrested by the Department of Homeland Security immediately after release from criminal custody in order to fall within the boundaries of 236c. The Court essentially falls back on the notion of “better late than never” and that just because a rule specifies that officials should act within a certain time frame does not prevent them from acting later. In light of this holding, any delay between release from criminal custody and immigration custody, even if significant, is not likely to impact whether the individual is afforded an opportunity for release proper to court proceedings.

The bottom line is that this is, for the time being, the final word on this issue (although the Court notes that the decision is based on statutory arguments, not necessarily constitutional principles.) Therefore, non-US Citizens charged with criminal offenses need to be especially vigilant and sensitive as to how their criminal charges may expose them to immigration detention and removal proceedings. Potential allegations of Aggravated Felonies and Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude should be identified well ahead of any plea or resolution of the criminal matter.

The above is general information only and not intended to serve as legal advice. It does not create an attorney client relationship, nor should it be relied upon in lieu of consultation with an immigration attorney.

Findlaw Network