Lee & Garasia, LLC
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

You Can Be Denied Citizenship For Bad Acts

| Jan 6, 2020 | Citizenship and Naturalization

Late last year, USCIS adopted two significant policy changes pertaining to Good Moral Character for naturalization petitions. (Every applicant must demonstrate Good Moral Character in order to become a US Citizen.) The first one, which we previously covered, pertained to drunk driving convictions and how two or more convictions raised a rebuttable presumption against a finding of good moral character. The second change is equally troubling and concerns unlawful bad acts which can militate against and render someone ineligible to naturalize. In its new policy guidance, the agency has gone ahead and fleshed out examples recognized by caselaw that can constitute a disqualifying “unlawful act.” Some of them include but are not limited to:

· Bail jumping

· Bank fraud

· Conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance

· Failure to file or pay taxes

· Falsification of records

· False claim to US citizenship

· Forgery-uttering

· Insurance fraud

· Obstruction of justice

· Sexual assault

· Social security fraud

· Unlawful harassment

· Unlawfully registering to vote

· Unlawful voting

· Violating a US embargo

According to the Policy Manual, officers are obligated to conduct a case-by-case analysis to determine whether the act adversely reflects on the applicant’s good moral character and weigh the existence of any extenuating circumstances. However, it is important to note that a finding of unlawful act(s) does not technically require the applicant to have been charged with, let alone convicted of the offense. Adjudicators are to identify the applicable law and determine whether the applicant’s conduct violated the law-regardless of whether civil or criminal proceedings were initiated or concluded. In determining whether the applicant committed the offense, an officer may base his/her finding on a record of conviction; an admission to the elements of the criminal or civil offense; or any other relevant, reliable evidence in the record showing commission of the unlawful act.

Despite the new guidance, it is important to remember that the unlawful act must have occurred during the statutory period under consideration. For most applicants, the statutory period is the five years preceding the application and up through the time of the interview; under certain circumstances, the statutory period is three years, if the applicant has been a permanent resident for at least three years and married and living in marital union with a US Citizen spouse for at least three years preceding the application.

All of these policy changes point towards a higher level of scrutiny for the new year. Officers are now being vested with unprecedented discretion and new tools with which to potentially stymie an applicant’s application for citizenship.

The above is general information only. It is not intended as legal advice nor intended to create an attorney-client relationship. If you need advice, please consult with an attorney.

Findlaw Network