Lee & Garasia, LLC
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

How Does Legalization of Marijuana in New Jersey Affect My Immigration Case?

| Nov 12, 2020 | Immigration Consequences of Crimes

A very important crimmigration case came out last week that is of particular interest to residents of New Jersey who recently approved a ballot legalizing marijuana.  New Jersey will soon join eleven other states and the District of Columbia which currently legalize cannabis despite its criminalization of its use, possession, and sale under federal law.   Under Khan v. Attorney General, the Third Circuit ruled in a precedential decision that the “stop-time” rule was not halted even if the conviction which served to trigger it was subsequently decriminalized and vacated.  This is significant because foreign nationals seeking cancellation of removal (the most coveted form of relief in immigration court) must demonstrate a requisite period of continuous residence in order to qualify.  However, the clock is stopped anytime the individual commits an offense referenced under 8 USC 1182(a)(2)—a section of the law that encompasses both crimes involving moral turpitude as well as violations of any law related to a controlled dangerous substance.

In this case, the individual was convicted of a marijuana offense that was later vacated due to change in the law, rendering the offense no longer a crime. Mr. Khan unsuccessfully argued that due to this development, the stop time rule should not have been triggered and that he was eligible to apply for cancellation of removal.  The Court was not persuaded, ruling that the vacatur had no effect when the offense was committed; and that decriminalization of the statute had no effect on whether the noncitizen was rendered inadmissible due to that conduct.  The decision holds that in general, “the immigration consequences of a criminal conviction are typically fixed at the time of conviction and not altered by post-conviction developments in the law.” The Court limits the contours of Matter of Pickering, holding that only convictions vacated due to “a defect in the underlying criminal proceeding” will cease to have the legal effect of a “conviction” for immigration purposes: Pickering does not stand for the proposition that only convictions vacated because of “rehabilitation or immigration hardships” don’t count.

This is particularly relevant now that New Jersey will soon be enacting legislation legalizing marijuana.  Non-citizens with previous drug convictions who are facing removal proceedings should consult with both their criminal defense and immigration attorney to assess how upcoming legislation will interact with current caselaw.

The above is general information only.  It is not specific legal advice nor intended to create an attorney client relationship.  If you need advice, please consult with an attorney.

Findlaw Network