Lee & Garasia, LLC
Se Habla Espanol
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

Immigration Judges No Longer Allowed To Postpone Cases Without “Good Cause”

| Aug 28, 2018 | Immigration Court, Immigration Court Cases

Following on the heels of Castro-Tum, the Attorney General has issued another ruling that erodes the judicial independence of our immigration judiciary and further mechanizes the courtroom into an assembly line. In Matter of L-A-B-R, 27 I & N Dec. 405 (A.G. 2018), AG Sessions ruled that continuances may only be granted for “good cause.” Instead of allowing judges to exercise their own discretion, the ruling constrains them to push cases forward, prioritizing administrative efficiency over due process and substantive relief. 

When determining whether to grant a continuance for a collateral proceeding, the courts must now engage in a multifactor balancing analysis. Judges must primarily consider the likelihood that collateral relief will be granted and whether the collateral relief will materially affect the outcome of the removal proceedings. Additional, secondary factors that also need to be assessed include whether the respondent exercised reasonable diligence in pursuing the relief; the government’s position, ie., whether the immigration prosecutor is opposing a continuance; the length of the requested continuance; and the procedural history of the case. Furthermore, the judge must “remain mindful” of the alien’s burden of demonstrating good cause.

Taken together with Castro-Tum, this decision will deprive many individuals of potential relief by foreclosing their ability to pursue collateral applications outside of court that would grant them status. By circumscribing judges’ authority to grant continuances and administratively close cases, the pair of rulings handicap the tribunal-the arbiter presumably in the best position to determine what is appropriate. It will undoubtedly exert a chilling effect on the bench: something as simple as a continuance will now invite scrutiny and disapprobation, especially considering that the government will invariably object to any postponement. With all this pressure to push cases to conclusion, many respondents will inevitably suffer on account of government delays beyond their control. Unlike EOIR, USCIS has no such mandate to process cases quickly. To illustrate, there are some types of cases that used to take four months to process from beginning to end; these same cases are now projected to take up to two years.

Practically speaking, it may be considerably harder now for individuals to seek continuances for pending I-130s, I-485s, I-360s, I-751s, and N-400 applications, to name a few. Just how these new constraints will affect an already strained and overburdened docket remain to be seen, but the outlook does not appear favorable given the direction things appear to be going.

The above is general information only and not to be relied upon as legal advice. It does not create an attorney client relationship nor should it be relied upon as advice in lieu of consultation with an attorney. 

Findlaw Network