Lee & Garasia, LLC
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

New Policy for I-751 Green Card Interviews

| Dec 17, 2018 | Green Cards

USCIS has issued a new policy memorandum that provides guidance to USCIS officers on waiving interviews for I-751 cases. Under the Immigration and Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986, immigrants who have been married for less than two years to their petitioning spouse at the time their case is approved are granted “conditional green cards.” To remove these conditions, immigrants must file the I-751 petition, normally together with their spouses, but in some cases, alone with a waiver request. Over the last two years, we have seen an uptick in I-751 cases being scheduled for interviews, even for cases which are clearly approvable and devoid of any issues-which therefore makes the timing of this new guidance intriguing. In any case, the new policy is overall positive and may help to expedite the processing of I-751 cases (which are currently taking close to 18 months and in some cases, longer) by allowing officers to dispense with interviews under certain circumstances.

As stated in the memorandum, the purpose of interviewing conditional residents is to allow USCIS the chance to verify information as well explore new information that may be relevant to the adjudication of the case. However, not every case may necessarily warrant an in-person interview. Effective December 10, 2018, USCIS may waive or dispense with interviews under the following circumstances:

· A decision can be rendered based on the documentation in the record because there is sufficient evidence that the marriage is genuine and not entered into to evade the immigration laws;

· For Form I-751 cases received on/after December 10, 2018, USCIS has previously interviewed the I-751 principal petitioner (for example, for an I-485 adjustment of status or I-130 Petition for Alien Relative);

· There is no indication of fraud or misrepresentation in the Form I-751 or the supporting documentation; and

· There are no complex facts or issues that require an interview to resolve questions or concerns.

The guidance further notes that these guidelines will be applied regardless of whether the I-751 is a joint petition or self-petition/waiver. While statistically speaking, waivers are probably scheduled for interviews more frequently than joint petitions, this formalized guidance may allow more meritorious self-petitions to be approved without undergoing the vagaries that sometimes characterize interviews. The fact of the matter is that while the purpose of an interview is well intentioned, a lot of things can go terribly wrong. Scheduling an interview can delay adjudication of a case much longer than necessary and possibly lead to marital tension by the time the couple is summoned to appear. Furthermore, people who are expected to appear for a formal hearing are invariably and understandably nervous, especially when the impression is that USCIS only schedules interviews for “problem cases”; this nervousness can often be misinterpreted by an officer, especially if an individual appears flustered, confused or flat-out intimidated by an officer. Clearly, a lot of false positives can be avoided through judicious use of interviews, especially given that many couples will have already been interviewed and vetted the first time around for the conditional green card. Hopefully with time, we will see the practical effects of the memo’s implementation and eventually shorter adjudication times.

The above is general information only and not to be relied upon as legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor should it be relied upon in lieu of consultation with an attorney.

Findlaw Network