Lee & Garasia, LLC
  • Tel: 732-516-1717
  • Toll free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence for Over 20 Years
  • "Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client's needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly... recommend this firm to anyone." Read More

  • "I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate." Read More

  • "I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You've really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate." Read More

  • "Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time." Read More

  • "Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time." Read More

  • "I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!" Read More

  • "Stalin - Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs." Read More

  • "Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work.He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia." Read More

  • "Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)" Read More

Court Rules Individuals Detained For More Than 180 Days Entitled To Bond Hearing

Immigration court matters arguably present some of the most challenging areas to understand. This is especially so with respect to detention issues, where an individual's liberty is restrained, sometimes indefinitely. In a recent Third Circuit case, Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison, 2018 WL 4608970 (3d Cir. 2018), a person was held in ICE detention for a staggering 637 days before finally securing release (and only after protracted litigation involving several motions). This case is particularly important for non-US citizens residing in the Third Circuit who are at risk of lengthy detention.

In deciding Mr. Guerrero-Sanchez's case, the court draws a clear distinction between INA Sections 8 USC 1226(a) and 8 USC 1231(a). The distinction is dispositive because if 1226(a) applies, an individual will normally receive a bond hearing at the outset of proceedings; on the other hand, if section 1231(a) applies, the person will already have been the subject of an order of removal and therefore not necessarily entitled to a bond hearing. The case at hand specifically concerned an individual who was the subject of a reinstatement order but who had applied for withholding of removal. The court ultimately held that detention of such people-subject to reinstatement but applicants for withholding-is governed by the post-order statute, 8 USC 1231. But the holding goes beyond that, which is why this case is so significant. While the literal language of 1231(a)(6) does not explicitly refer to bond hearings for individuals who are the subject of final orders of removal, the government is ordinarily expected to remove the alien within 90 days. If the person is still in custody past the 90-day, Supreme Court precedent construes and authorizes continued detention "only as long as 'reasonably necessary' to remove them from the country." Within this context, the Third Circuit identified due process concerns, but rather than engaging in a constitutional calculus, chose to adopt a bright line rule enforced in the Ninth Circuit, namely that all aliens detained under section 1231(a)(6) and facing prolonged detention are entitled to a bond hearing after six months (180 days) of custody. During this hearing, the government bears the burden of demonstrating, by clear and convincing evidence, that the individual is a flight risk or poses a danger to the community.

The impact of this holding is not only tremendous but far reaching. It affects individuals who have been ordered removed but still detained for more than six months, including those who have been detained pursuant to reinstatement orders but now applicants for withholding; those who have petitioned for direct review of their removal orders without a stay of removal in place; those who have final orders and petitioned to reopen their cases (or petitioned for review of a denied motion to reopen) without a stay; as well as individuals who have final orders without any pending challenges or stays.

In light of this new decision, those who have been ordered removed and remain in detention past six months are encouraged to explore their options with an attorney. The above is general information only and not intended to serve as legal advice. It does not create an attorney client relationship, nor should it be relied upon in lieu of consultation with an immigration attorney.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION

    • Avvo Rating 10.0 | Superb
    • Client Distinction Award martindale.com | 2016 Martindale-Hubbell Client Distinction Award
    • New Jersey State Bar Association | Paris Lee Chair - Immigration Section 2015-2016
    • Nationally Recognized | Newsweek Nationwide Showcase | Top Attorneys 2013
    • New Jersey Chapter | American Immigration Lawyers Association | Angie Garasia | Chapter Chair 2015-2016
Email Us For A Response

Start Your Case Evaluation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Lee & Garasia, LLC
190 State Route 27
Edison, NJ 08820

Map & Directions

icon phone732-516-1717 icon phone888-404-5876