Lee & Garasia, LLC
Se Habla Espanol
Tel: 732-516-1717
Toll Free: 888-404-5876
Experience, Accessibility, and Excellence
for Over 20 Years
“When it comes to immigration, I go to Paris and Angie–and trust me, I know a lot of lawyers all over the world.”–Renzo Gracie, Brazilian Jiujitsu and MMA Legend 
Read More
“Lee and Garasia are excellent lawyers, punctual and professional. They are dedicated to going above and beyond the usual level of service to meet your client’s needs. Their staff is very knowledgeable, friendly and polite. I would highly… recommend this firm to anyone.”
Read More
“I would definitely recommend Mr.Lee and Garasia as an immigration attorney because they did a great job with my case i.e. of Adjustment of Status (i-485). Mr. Lee helped us in each and every detailed information and prepared to the best of it. It was all well done and would like to appreciate.”
Read More
“I would like to thank my lawyer Mr Lee & Garasia and the staff for all immense help and patience throughout this entire process, I really appreciate your constant attention to my case, as well to my questions and my concerns. You’ve really made this process much more comprehensive to me, which I greatly appreciate.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee and Ms. Garasia did a great job with my renewal of my permanent residence application. They help prepare the paperwork with such a great attention to details and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“Mr. Lee did a great job with the renewal of my permanent residence application. My case was very time sensitive and they worked really fast on my case with great detail and accuracy. I will recommend the law firm every time.”
Read More
“I would recommend Attorney Paris Lee for anybody who needs immigration consultation. Mr. Lee is THE lawyer who respects and cares clients. Mr. Lee is professional and honest. Bottom line, preparation for the results and NO BS!”
Read More
“Stalin – Lee did a wonderful job, Got my wife her visa in one year. He is extremely helpful and knowledgeable. I would highly recommend him for all your immigration needs.”
Read More
“Hello. I appoint him as my immigration lawyer and that way he solved my cases was truly amazing. He was so honest and knowledgeable for his work. He solved my all family immigration issues and because of his effort we were able to get done our immigration work done successful. Thank you lee and garasia.”
Read More
“Lee & Garasia stand for accountability and responsibility. They are reliable, honest and are always constructively looking for a solution. A big thanks :)”
Read More

New Rules Regarding Fast Track Deportation Soon To Take Effect

| Sep 30, 2019 | Deportation

Given the magnitude and ramifications of the government’s imminent expansion of expedited removal, the lack of media coverage is confounding. In any case, readers should be aware that the new criteria is set to be applied any day now. In fact, according to an internal ICE memo dated July 24, implementation was set begin at the beginning of September.

As discussed in an earlier blog, expedited removal is a mechanism by which the government is able to summarily deport someone without formally placing an individual into removal proceedings before an immigration judge. Under the law, expedited removal can only be applied against non citizens who 1) either lack valid entry documents, commit fraud or misrepresentation to obtain admission, or who falsely claim citizenship; and 2) who are encountered within 100 miles of the border who have not been physically present in the US continuously for 14 days. However, under the expansion, expedited removal can now be applied to potentially any non-citizen anywhere within the US who cannot prove continuous physical presence for at least two years. (Importantly, the individual must still be charged as inadmissible under sections 212(a)(6)(C) or (a)(7)-pertaining to lack of valid entry documents or fraud.).

According to the memo, it is anticipated that the new guidelines will be applied largely in the Criminal Alien Program (“CAP”) and worksite enforcement contexts. Moreover, while an individual may present a prima facie case allowing for expedited removal, ICE officers still retain a large degree of discretion to not apply it. In fact, there are a number of alternatives that an ICE officer may feel are more appropriate, including but not limited to allowing the person to depart voluntarily; allowing the person to withdraw his/her application for admission; or placing the individual in regular removal proceedings before a judge. Under the memo, some relevant factors that an officer may consider include a person’s mental competency; whether the person is the sole caregiver of a US Citizen child or children; whether a person qualifies for relief in immigration court; the duration of a person’s presence in the US and the nature of his or her ties to the country; and whether additional charging grounds are contemplated.

That being said, non US Citizens would be well advised to consider carrying proof of their status, if lawfully present. Technically, lawful permanent residents 18 and older are actually required to carry their green cards with them at all times under INA 264(e). Those who are not lawfully present are especially vulnerable to abuse under the July 24 designation and should carry evidence of their presence on them. Although this sounds incredibly inconvenient and onerous, the memo indicates that the noncitizen bears an affirmative burden to demonstrate to an officer’s satisfaction that he/she has been physically present in the US continuously for two years with evidence establishing place, date, and manner of entry and continuity of presence since since that time.

Barring a capricious change of heart by the Administration or litigation that blocks the expansion, this is happening. Non US citizens need to be prepared and understand that they may not only be unfairly accused of entering the country illegally, but also have to rebut such accusations with documentary proof of continuous physical presence.

Findlaw Network